{{semorg-toolbox
|name=Petition: Collect signatures to show many people support your vision!
|description=You have a very clear picture of the local change you want to achieve? You want to show decision makers how much support your vision localy has? Then a petition might be your cup of tea to drive change.
|hypothesis=Proofing that a certain local change is backed up localy might convince decision makers to follow your vision.
|lock-in-layers=institutional
|lock-in-cluster=Lack of Motivation/Intention & Habits, Personal and Social Beliefs, Governance incumbency
|tool-maturity-level=TML5
|link-information=https://www.change.org/petition-guides/how-to-write-a-petition, https://wirmachen.wien/how-to/how-to-petitionen/
|link-material=https://www.change.org/petition-guides/how-to-write-a-petition, https://wirmachen.wien/how-to/how-to-petitionen/
|effort-level=very high
|skill-level=medium
|spatial-context=neighbourhood
|spatial-limitation=no
|target-group=NGOs / local interest groups
|visualisation=Petition.jpg
|tool-type=Action
|language=german, english
}}

2026-06-03T14:18:02Z

Paula von Krosigk:

{{semorg-toolbox
|name=Low effort survey in public space
|description=The picture stems from Ljubljana, where the urban design studio prostorož set up benches in public space. They attached a QR-Code, where people could vote if they wanted this bench to stay. In a short period of time about 400 people voted, that they would like the bench to stay because they frequently use it. They then talked to the people in charge of that area. They showed them the survey and the benches were allowed to stay. What a success!
In case this inspires you to take action: Make sure that the QR-code is made out of solid material, that endures the time you want the survey to last. The tool material link will lead you to a website where different survey tools are offered, a lot of them without additional costs.
|hypothesis=This low barrier survey method gives insights about the use of public space. When discussed with decision makers it has the potential to unlock their beliefs about how the space should look like.
|lock-in-layers=institutional
|lock-in-cluster=Lack of Motivation/Intention & Habits, Personal and Social Beliefs, Attitudes
|tool-maturity-level=TML4
|link-information=-
|link-material=https://european-alternatives.eu/de/kategorie/online-umfrage-tools
|effort-level=low
|skill-level=low
|spatial-context=street level
|spatial-limitation=no
|target-group=local/district administration, local politicians, city administration, city politicians, NGOs / local interest groups
|visualisation=Bildschirmfoto 2026-06-02 um 16.37.06.png
|tool-type=Evidence
|language=english, german
}}

Tools/24

2026-06-03T14:17:09Z

Paula von Krosigk:

{{semorg-toolbox
|name=Mapping and analysing facades
|description="We need parking space otherwise our shops will die!" This is an argument often brought forward by opponents of street transformation. The urban design studio prostorož confronted this claim with evidence. They analysed the facades of the street by the following categories: Lively facade, active facade, monument, empty facade, unremarkable facade. They could show that a lot of the ground floor was at that point in time not occupied.
prostorož combined this analysis with analysing parking place occupancy and human behaviour to build an even stronger argument, that a street full of cars is not helping shops. By combining all these analysis they managed to convince the decision makers to give that street a human friendly makeover!
|hypothesis=This analysis can help to unlock beliefs about how well shops are doing when a street is filled with parking places.
|lock-in-layers=institutional
|lock-in-cluster=Personal and Social Beliefs, Governance incumbency, Political agency
|tool-maturity-level=TML4
|link-information=-
|link-material=-
|effort-level=low
|skill-level=low
|spatial-context=street level
|spatial-limitation=no
|target-group=local/district administration, local politicians, city administration, city politicians, NGOs / local interest groups
|visualisation=Bildschirmfoto 2026-06-02 um 16.38.29.png
|tool-type=Evidence
|language=english
}}

Tools/24

2026-06-03T14:15:48Z

Paula von Krosigk:

{{semorg-toolbox
|name=Mapping and analysing facades
|description="We need parking space otherwise our shops will die!" This is an argument often brought forward by opponents of street transformation. The urban design studio prostorož confronted this claim with evidence. They analysed the facades of the street by the following categories: Lively facade, active facade, monument, empty facade, unremarkable facade. They could show that a lot of the ground floor was at that point in time not occupied.
prostorož combined this analysis with analysing parking place occupancy and human behaviour to build an even stronger argument, that a street full of cars is not helping the shops right now. By combining all these analysis they managed to convince the decision makers to give that street a human friendly makeover!
|hypothesis=This analysis can help to unlock beliefs about how well shops are doing when a street is filled with parking places.
|lock-in-layers=institutional
|lock-in-cluster=Personal and Social Beliefs, Governance incumbency, Political agency
|tool-maturity-level=TML4
|link-information=-
|link-material=-
|effort-level=low
|skill-level=low
|spatial-context=street level
|spatial-limitation=no
|target-group=local/district administration, local politicians, city administration, city politicians, NGOs / local interest groups
|visualisation=Bildschirmfoto 2026-06-02 um 16.38.29.png
|tool-type=Evidence
|language=english
}}

Tools/39

2026-06-03T14:15:05Z

Paula von Krosigk:

{{semorg-toolbox
|name=Community mapping
|description=Collaboratively mapping maps about a neighbourhood can shed light on factors that influence everyday transport-related decisions.
|hypothesis=Lack of knowledge of local needs
|lock-in-layers=institutional
|lock-in-cluster=Lack of Motivation/Intention & Habits, Perceived Experience & Evaluation, Political agency
|tool-maturity-level=TML5
|link-information=https://mobilbericht.mobilitaet.tu-berlin.de/communitymapping/
|link-material=https://mobilbericht.mobilitaet.tu-berlin.de/communitymapping/ https://www.maptionnaire.com/, https://www.govocal.com/
|effort-level=medium
|skill-level=low
|spatial-context=flexible
|spatial-limitation=no
|target-group=general public, local/district administration, local politicians, city administration, city politicians, residents of particular area, NGOs / local interest groups, users of sustainable modes, car drivers
|visualisation=Community mapping credits.png
|tool-type=Evidence
|lll=Augsburg
|language=english, german
|empowerment-strategy=shared knowledge generation, shared public participation
}}

Tools/24

2026-06-03T14:13:54Z

Paula von Krosigk: Created page with "{{semorg-toolbox |name=Mapping and analysing facades |description="We need parking space otherwise our shops will die!" This is an argument often brought forward by opponents of street transformation. The urban design studio prostorož confronted this claim with evidence. They analysed the facades of the street by the following categories: Lively facade, active facade, monument, empty facade, unremarkable facade. They could show that a lot of the ground floor was at th..."

{{semorg-toolbox
|name=Mapping and analysing facades
|description="We need parking space otherwise our shops will die!" This is an argument often brought forward by opponents of street transformation. The urban design studio prostorož confronted this claim with evidence. They analysed the facades of the street by the following categories:
Lively facade, active facade, monument, empty facade, unremarkable facade. They could show that a lot of the ground floor was at that point in time not occupied. prostorož combined this analysis with analysing parking place occupancy and human behaviour to build an even stronger argument, that a street full of cars is not helping the shops right now. By combining all these analysis they managed to convince the decision makers to give that street a human friendly makeover!
|hypothesis=This analysis can help to unlock beliefs about how well shops are doing when a street is filled with parking places.
|lock-in-layers=institutional
|lock-in-cluster=Personal and Social Beliefs, Governance incumbency, Political agency
|tool-maturity-level=TML4
|link-information=-
|link-material=-
|effort-level=low
|skill-level=low
|spatial-context=street level
|spatial-limitation=no
|target-group=local/district administration, local politicians, city administration, city politicians, NGOs / local interest groups
|visualisation=Bildschirmfoto 2026-06-02 um 16.38.29.png
|tool-type=Evidence
|language=english
}}

2026-06-03T11:48:58Z

Paula von Krosigk:

{{semorg-toolbox
|name=Flowers of Proximity
|description=The flowers are a planning tool that invites participants to look beyond their current travel routines by imagining instead how they would like to get around. This perspective grounds accessibility planning in people's needs and desires, helping make cities more livable, sustainable, and fair.
|hypothesis=The tool allows to discuss the status-quo of a neighborhood or compare the situation across neighborhood. This can help to collect action points regarding further analysis regarding the perceived expericence of alternatives (e.g. car-oriented public space as barrier for more cycling).
|lock-in-layers=institutional
|lock-in-cluster=Economic investments
|tool-maturity-level=TML2
|link-information=https://www.flowersofproximity.com/
|link-material=https://www.eiturbanmobility.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/EIT-UrbanMobilityNext9_15-min-City_144dpi.pdf
|effort-level=low
|skill-level=low
|spatial-context=district
|spatial-limitation=yes
|target-group=local/district administration, residents of particular area, NGOs / local interest groups
|visualisation=Flower of proximity large.svg
|tool-objectives=* make plans for local mobility transition accessible to new target groups through new narratives and communication channels
* reach significant level of attention to change public opinion
|tool-type=Evidence
|lll=Vienna, Augsburg, Sete, Almere, Porto
|language=english
|empowerment-strategy=shared communication of narratives
}}