No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|name=Mapping and analysing facades | |name=Mapping and analysing facades | ||
|description="We need parking space otherwise our shops will die!" This is an argument often brought forward by opponents of street transformation. The urban design studio prostorož confronted this claim with evidence. They analysed the facades of the street by the following categories: Lively facade, active facade, monument, empty facade, unremarkable facade. They could show that a lot of the ground floor was at that point in time not occupied. | |description="We need parking space otherwise our shops will die!" This is an argument often brought forward by opponents of street transformation. The urban design studio prostorož confronted this claim with evidence. They analysed the facades of the street by the following categories: Lively facade, active facade, monument, empty facade, unremarkable facade. They could show that a lot of the ground floor was at that point in time not occupied. | ||
prostorož combined this analysis with analysing parking place occupancy and human behaviour to build an even stronger argument | prostorož combined this analysis with analysing parking place occupancy and human behaviour to build an even stronger argument: A street full of cars is not helping shops at the moment. By combining all these analysis they managed to convince the decision makers to give that street a human friendly makeover! | ||
|hypothesis=This analysis can help to unlock beliefs about how well shops are doing when a street is filled with parking places. | |hypothesis=This analysis can help to unlock beliefs about how well shops are doing when a street is filled with parking places. | ||
|lock-in-layers=institutional | |lock-in-layers=institutional | ||
Latest revision as of 16:01, 3 June 2026
"We need parking space otherwise our shops will die!" This is an argument often brought forward by opponents of street transformation. The urban design studio prostorož confronted this claim with evidence. They analysed the facades of the street by the following categories: Lively facade, active facade, monument, empty facade, unremarkable facade. They could show that a lot of the ground floor was at that point in time not occupied. prostorož combined this analysis with analysing parking place occupancy and human behaviour to build an even stronger argument: A street full of cars is not helping shops at the moment. By combining all these analysis they managed to convince the decision makers to give that street a human friendly makeover!
This analysis can help to unlock beliefs about how well shops are doing when a street is filled with parking places.
institutional
Personal and Social Beliefs, Governance incumbency, Political agency
TML4
-
-
low
low
street level
no
local/district administration, local politicians, city administration, city politicians, NGOs / local interest groups
Evidence
english