From Unlock15
Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{semorg-toolbox
{{semorg-toolbox
|name=Joint Survey between initiatives and district politics
|name=Joint Survey between initiatives and district politics
|description=A joint survey between district politics and initatives has a lot of potential to drive change. A survey means to ask inhabitants of an area questions what they like or don't like about status quo and what they want to change. The initative has local knowledge of the area and knows what is important to ask. The survey results give politicans guidance what kind of change is backed up by the inhabitants.
|description=A joint survey between district politics and initiatives has potential to drive change. A survey means to ask inhabitants of an area what they like or don't like about status quo and what they want to change. The initiative has local knowledge of the area and knows what is important to ask. The survey results give politicans guidance what kind of change is backed up by the inhabitants.  
From our experience a joint survey is possible when
# all involved people are amicable towards each other
# there is a third neutral party (for example science project or neighbourhood management) that coordinates the process
|hypothesis=On the one hand, this creates a picture of acceptance of the initiative's demands. On the other hand, cooperation with politicians creates a stronger sense of responsibility on the part of political decision-makers.
|hypothesis=On the one hand, this creates a picture of acceptance of the initiative's demands. On the other hand, cooperation with politicians creates a stronger sense of responsibility on the part of political decision-makers.
|lock-in-layers=institutional, behavioural
|lock-in-layers=institutional, behavioural
|lock-in-cluster=Perceived Experience & Evaluation, Governance incumbency, Political agency
|lock-in-cluster=Perceived Experience & Evaluation, Governance incumbency, Political agency
|tool-maturity-level=TML3
|tool-maturity-level=TML3
|link-information=LLL One16 in Vienna
|link-information=https://mitgestalten.wien.gv.at/de-DE/projects/sommeroase-hasnerstrasse/1
|link-material=-
|link-material=https://mitgestalten.wien.gv.at/de-DE/projects/sommeroase-hasnerstrasse/1
|effort-level=high
|effort-level=high
|skill-level=medium
|skill-level=medium
Line 14: Line 17:
|target-group=general public, local/district administration, local politicians, city politicians, residents of particular area, NGOs / local interest groups
|target-group=general public, local/district administration, local politicians, city politicians, residents of particular area, NGOs / local interest groups
|visualisation=Joint survvey2.jpg
|visualisation=Joint survvey2.jpg
|tool-type=Action
|tool-type=Evidence
|lll=Vienna
|lll=Vienna
|language=german
|language=german
|empowerment-strategy=shared knowledge generation, shared communication of narratives, shared public participation
|empowerment-strategy=shared knowledge generation, shared communication of narratives, shared public participation
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 12:16, 1 June 2026

TOOL
Joint Survey between initiatives and district politics
Short description

A joint survey between district politics and initiatives has potential to drive change. A survey means to ask inhabitants of an area what they like or don't like about status quo and what they want to change. The initiative has local knowledge of the area and knows what is important to ask. The survey results give politicans guidance what kind of change is backed up by the inhabitants. From our experience a joint survey is possible when

  1. all involved people are amicable towards each other
  2. there is a third neutral party (for example science project or neighbourhood management) that coordinates the process
Unlock-hypothesis

On the one hand, this creates a picture of acceptance of the initiative's demands. On the other hand, cooperation with politicians creates a stronger sense of responsibility on the part of political decision-makers.

Lock-in Layers

institutional, behavioural

Lock-in Cluster

Perceived Experience & Evaluation, Governance incumbency, Political agency

Tool maturity Level

TML3

Level of effort for application

high

Skill level needed for application

medium

Suitable spatial context

flexible

Spatial limitation

no

Target group

general public, local/district administration, local politicians, city politicians, residents of particular area, NGOs / local interest groups

Visualisation

Tool type

Evidence

LLL-Application

Vienna

Languages

german