Evidence

← All tools with a focus on: Evidence / Vision / Action

Create Tool

Filter

Languages: dutch · english × · french · german · greek · italian · norwegian · spanish

Suitable spatial context: district · flexible

Level of effort for application: high · low · very low

Challenges: Incomplete cycling and walking infrastructure · Lack of a collaborative culture · Lack of a vision for change · Lack of access to hard-to-reach groups · Lack of funding · Slow bureaucratic processes

Toolbox user types: Local administration · Local government × · NGOs/ local interest groups

15min-City online Maps

The map shows how close services are if one lives in different areas of the city: in red areas the time needed to access the closest services is on average higher than 15 minutes, while the blue are 15-minute areas. We consider the average time of accessibility to the closest 20 POIs.

Centralized participation platform

"Mitgestalten.wien" is an example for a centralized participation plattform. We used it to run a survey for Unlock15 in Vienna about the future development of a street. "decidim.org" and "govocal.com" are plattforms that can help you set up a centralised participation plattform.

Joint Survey between initiatives and district politics

In Vienna they managed something extraordinary: They did a survey collaboratively between district politics, administration and civil society. This has a lot of potential for different reasons:

Measuring the 15-min city: Flowers of Proximity

The flowers are a planning tool that invites participants to look beyond their current travel routines by imagining instead how they would like to get around. This perspective grounds accessibility planning in people's needs and desires, helping make cities more livable, sustainable, and fair.